Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Scotts#220 Line Through 2's Error

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 513Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
175 Posts
Posted 02/12/2025   10:20 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Dale Kramer to your friends list Get a Link to this Message




Looking for advice. Found in my collection yesterday and want to know, is this a common error? thanks in advance.
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
8886 Posts
Posted 02/12/2025   10:46 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is not an error but a fairly common happening. This is probably just some ink left on a roller, blade or other part of the press. On some issues this is called a "ductor blade line" or a "doctor blade line".


Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Petert4522 - 02/12/2025 10:47 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1884 Posts
Posted 02/12/2025   10:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add essayk to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You have an interesting EFO item.

It is not an error.
The combination of defects your stamp shows: horiz line is a plate flaw; and cap on left "2" is a transfer variety.

The plate flaw occurs on the finished plate, while the cap on "2" is a stage in the breakup of a relief on a transfer roll. It is not common to find both such defects on the same stamp.

The horizontal line plate "scratch" appears to be one mark but broken over the surface. It might have been a gouge from the bottom edge of another plate, but that is a wild guess only.
Most actual "scratches" are not as straight as this one looks to my eyes, but this one appears to span the full width of the design. The "cap on left '2'" is a fairly early stage for that break.

Since I am not an EFO specialist, I will leave it for others to fill in the blanks.

But neither of these defects is an "error."
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
175 Posts
Posted 02/12/2025   5:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dale Kramer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank You For that information, it's really helpful! I didn't notice a cap in the stamp. I have to take a second look!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
175 Posts
Posted 02/12/2025   6:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dale Kramer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Along the same line, I have a #220 with (I Think) a cap on the right???
Any thoughts?


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Switzerland
333 Posts
Posted 02/13/2025   05:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add drkohler to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
No. Check here how a cap looks like:
https://www.theswedishtiger.com/220-scotts.html
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
175 Posts
Posted 02/13/2025   09:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dale Kramer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
yes, I have 220's with caps on left and both 2's. I think this must be an ink problem!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
175 Posts
Posted 02/14/2025   6:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dale Kramer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I checked out Swedish Tiger and they have an example that someone submitted with the cap on the right! actually my example looked better then the one submitted.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
642 Posts
Posted 02/14/2025   9:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Germania to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Regarding the cap on the right 2 there is some controversy if it is a real variety or not. This was discussed in American Philatelist in the March 1991 issue, attached. If not too legible you can download it freely from the APS website. This article is now more than 30 years old; does anyone know if new information is available?



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3822 Posts
Posted 02/14/2025   10:44 pm  Show Profile Check eyeonwall's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add eyeonwall to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I could be wrong, but I believe there was a long heated discussion of it on the board some years ago.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
11509 Posts
Posted 02/15/2025   12:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
None of the stamps scanned into the above posts are the cap variety. The Swedish Tiger is also not always a great place to find accurate information.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1221 Posts
Posted 02/15/2025   09:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
eyeonwall, Yes there was. My memory isn't the best but I think it started over a listing for one (right cap) on sale for a pretty large amount. I could be wrong about that, but that's what I'm thinking.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Al E. Gator - 02/15/2025 09:16 am
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 513Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2025 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2025 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05