Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Problem With Drying Book

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 1,061Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
5356 Posts
Posted 12/01/2024   03:46 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NSK to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The other major use of talcum is to treat the back of self-adhesive stamps. Proper and complete removal of the self adhesive layer makes talcum use unnecessary.


Its popularity is with self-adhesives that often have a gum that cannot fully be removed without damaging the stamp and it is applied to the back. Proper and complete gum removal is not an option with those stamps.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by NSK - 12/01/2024 03:48 am
Bedrock Of The Community
11509 Posts
Posted 12/01/2024   08:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Not too concerned with talc for most stamps since they have already been in their life handled by fingers, stored in various plastics, papers and glassines, perhaps soaked in lighter fluid, and have generally speaking been around the block. I would be much more concerned with plastic chemicals, UV and bodily oils.

Note: Plastics contain talc.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
6060 Posts
Posted 12/01/2024   08:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Note: Plastics contain talc

Yes indeed many do, but you seem unwilling to acknowledge or differentiate between talc embedded within the structrue of the plastic during the manufacture and loose talc particles willingly added later by collectors.


To all, show us where the National Archives or the Smithsonian's Postal Museum or another major archive actively uses this as a regular, accepted archival practice, rather than individual collector anecdotes. Also, do some testing yourself and report back.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3822 Posts
Posted 12/01/2024   09:59 am  Show Profile Check eyeonwall's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add eyeonwall to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
To get back on topic, some regular gum stamps still have gum on the back after soaking. Carefully lightly rub the back with your finger while the stamp os still wet and then back into a fresh bowl of water. Might have to repeat again.

Back off topic, not sold on the use of talc.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
628 Posts
Posted 12/01/2024   10:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Linus to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Silhat said in the OP:


Quote:
So where did I miss ? I know some here don't use drying books, but that's not the point here, I know of other methods, I just want to be able to use those books correctly.


In my opinion, this is where you missed...

I have soaked thousands of stamps in my life and have learned this life lesson. Whenever a stamp sticks when you are pressing them flat, the reason is because the stamp was too wet. You must let the stamp air dry until just a little bit of moisture is left, and the gum has hardened somewhat. Then, you can apply weights to press the stamp flat. Remember, if the stamp gum sticks to your finger, it is still too wet, and if the stamp gum does not stick to your finger, it has air-dried enough to be pressed. Try this and let us know.

Hope this helps you,

Linus
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
France, Metropolitan
57 Posts
Posted 12/01/2024   6:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Silhat to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Minus : I think you are right : the stamps were too wet. I tried with another batch and use some absorbing paper.

The results are much more what I expected.

Thanks for your help.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 1,061Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2025 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2025 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05