| Author |
 Replies: 263 / Views: 16,072 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
861 Posts |
|
|
Q5. White flaw in vertical shading right of top star (Watermark 65)  Q6. White flaw below right star (Watermark 40)  |
Send note to Staff 
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Both your stamps can be confirmed as constant, see scans below.   Tasnaki. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
861 Posts |
|
|
Thanks Tasnaki. Adding those two to the list of constant flaws on this thread: 46. White flaw right of top star (Watermark 65)  47. White flaw below right star (Watermark 40)  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
861 Posts |
|
|
Q.7 Lower left side void (Watermark 65)  Q.8 Voids in lower shading at left (Watermark 68)  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 02/19/2022 10:52 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Top stamp should be WM65, plated as below:  Bottom stamp should be WM68. Not yet plated, it is an area I am currently working on. Probably from plate 6 pane A. If anyone can help with scans of any pairs or blocks to assist it would be greatly appreciated.  Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Tasnaki - 02/19/2022 8:39 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
861 Posts |
|
|
Quote:
Top stamp should be WM65, plated as below: Yes, both watermarks correct -sorry, should have added those watermarks to the above post and have now. The first void appears to be a later state than shown in your scans - void has grown. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 02/20/2022 06:07 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
861 Posts |
|
|
Other lower left shading flaws - all Watermark 68 (none of these in pairs or blocks) Q.8(i) Extended corners on lower left and right shading  Q.8(ii) Lower left and right shading flaws  Q.8(iii) Lower left corner flaws  Q.8(iv) Lower left shading flaws  Q.8(v) Lower left shading flaws  Q.8(vi) Lower left shading flaws  Q.8(vii) Shading flaws top right and lower left  Q.8(viii) Shading flaws lower left  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 02/19/2022 11:12 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Preferably not so many at once! It does take a bit of time to work them out until I have the flaw finder complete. Here they are! Number1  Not able to plate a position based on the bottom frame, there a quite a number with similar and the flaws tend to come and go. Number 2   Number 3   Number 4   Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
And the last 4. Number 5   Number 6   Number 7   Number 8  Not seen this one before, I will keep it on file. Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
861 Posts |
|
|
Thanks very much, Tasnaki.
Sorry about the flood - I thought it might be useful to see them all together.
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
861 Posts |
|
|
Now lower right shading: Q.9(i) Distorted lower right shading  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
I have a number with similar flaws, none plated as yet. The ones below are all WM68.  One has a right column watermark line (RC). Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
861 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
861 Posts |
|
|
Q9(ii) Lower right shading flaws (Watermark 68)  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Replies: 263 / Views: 16,072 |
|
Posted 02/19/2022 04:05 am
