Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

USPS 2016 Postal Service Guide to U.S. Stamps, 43rd Edition  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
31 Posts
Posted 01/09/2017   1:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add BwanaBob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
I just ordered this edition since I hadn't bought one in about 5 years. I am sorely disappointed. Here are my complaints:

1) Horrible images. They claim they were all recently digitally scanned. The resolution is much worse than the previous volumes where the colors were rich and the sizes of the images were larger.

1a) Terribly inconsistent image coloring. On pages where say multiple carmine colored stamps are printed, many of them are totally different colors. I can't blame the printers since some of the stamps on the same page are correct. My suspicion is the producers of this book farmed out image scanning to several interns who all did things differently. There's no way any copy editor who reviewed these
images was a stamp collector. No way. There are some stamps I didn't even recognize because the colors were so off.

2) Incomplete images. All Federal Duck images should have been included. In older editions this was so. Lazy.

3) They persist in their habit of sticking the latest years issues up front as if they are somehow special compared to the rest of the stamps. Why? Also, since they have some deal with Amos Publishing, and have access to Scott numbering there is no excuse for not having those numbers for the 2016 issues. If it's a lead time issue, then delay releasing the book for a month.

4) Needless fluff sections on philately basics. Leave that stuff on the website. Each page wasted there could have been used for more detailed listings and images of Duck stamps, postal stationary releases, etc.

I will be slow to replace this book in the coming years unless I hear of some of these issues being addressed.
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
4172 Posts
Posted 01/09/2017   1:46 pm  Show Profile Check Petert4522's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
BwanaBob, you really should address this to the US Postal Service!

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1793 Posts
Posted 01/09/2017   7:54 pm  Show Profile Check TheArtfulHinger's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add TheArtfulHinger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Needless fluff sections on philately basics. Leave that stuff on the website.

I don't have a copy of the book to see how much space they devote to such "fluff", but keep in mind what is fluff to you might be new and interesting information to someone else. There are undoubtedly many beginners or casual collectors who buy that book, and for some of them it might be their introduction to collecting. Keep in mind the USPS is writing it for the "intelligent but uninformed reader", so to speak, and not for advanced collectors. Even Scott devotes a fair amount of pages to what could be considered "basics" in the into to their catalogues.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by TheArtfulHinger - 01/09/2017 7:56 pm
Valued Member
110 Posts
Posted 01/10/2017   10:04 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add soccerfan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I've seen their books at hobby shops and the library. I suspect that USPS has new employees designing their guides. The images and resolutions are probably a cheaper way for them to update and design the book. Beckett creates magazines and books for sports cards; the magazines are image free of cards due to spacing issues. The company always lists their cards from oldest to newest. More companies are switching their resources from printed material to online viewing. Keep in mind that printed materials are only guides for a certain period in time (like a balance sheet). I use annual Scott books for checklists. If I need to distinguish images (size, color, etc.) I visit a source (Amos, eBay) online.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
79 Posts
Posted 01/10/2017   11:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add svensson to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
They are entertaining beginner guides that I have had no qualms about in the past, going back to USPS's "Stamps and Stories" in the 1970s. Sorry to hear that quality seems to be deteriorating...as you say, the advertising jazz implies that the image quality was improved in this edition! They are really not designed for someone looking to keep up on day by day price fluctuations (Becketts analogy...), they have been a quality product. imho
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
31 Posts
Posted 01/10/2017   4:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BwanaBob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
svensson - Yes, their advertising hype implied much better imagery. I have many of the older volumes that were beautiful consistent and also glossy. Now the new book is not glossy but that's not why many of the images are terrible. They could not have been consistently sourced. I'm steamed that this book was not first given to someone who was a collector for vetting. I also forgot to mention that in their zeal to protect revenue, they put slashes through every value on every image - including the word forever.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
31 Posts
Posted 01/10/2017   5:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BwanaBob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Oh, and I vented to the USPS in an email. Curious to hear their response. I will share it if it has any merit.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
31 Posts
Posted 03/21/2017   2:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BwanaBob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
They never responded other than "we received your comments". Typical.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  "The Stamp Collecting Mania" in the NY Times
  Spain Civil war issue
  Uruguay cover to Germany 1937. Airmail route???
  Older Scott Specialty Slip Cases???
  Eid stamp issue (May 24/17)
  Scott 106xx-7-P6 Precancel
  Seeking advice/comments on collection organization and storage
  3rd Reich / Nazi stamps
  US Scott 443 Washington 1c line single?
  The Stamps of Tokelau.
  Moscow to New York: two letter-size envelopes w/ Scott Russia #C75 1 PVB
  Can someone check the Part II of the new Minkus Pages for Togo Please
  Is my Washington 2 Cent stamp an error or just an oddity
  Need help please on this 1870 2 cent jackson scott 135 Red???
  Private Auctions on eBay
  Woohoo! Went 3 for 3 at the Philatelic Foundation!
  Help re Postal Service eGuide to US Stamps
  Imperforate 4d Kangaroo?
  Cut Square Stamp identification
  Looks like eBay is broken now?
  Canada Odd Unlisted Precancels - possibly Errors
  Canada Empress of Ireland press sheet
  Help with IDing watermark on cut square
  A perfectly placed ink void
  Lovely Q3 parcel post on first flight cover

  Older Scott Specialty Slip Cases???
  The Stamps of Tokelau.
  Eid stamp issue (May 24/17)
  Jaipur and Rabat - stationery envelopes
  Spain Civil war issue
  "The Stamp Collecting Mania" in the NY Times
  Don't be deceived by this odd item
  PDF style Stamp Album Pages
  US Scott 443 Washington 1c line single?
  Uruguay cover to Germany 1937. Airmail route???
  My Incredible Ebay Score
  Regency Stamp Auctions in St. Louis
  What are some RED CROSS stamps that you have??
  Textile and weaving of cloth
  Seeking advice/comments on collection organization and storage
  Waterfalls on Stamps
  Water on stamps
  Is my Washington 2 Cent stamp an error or just an oddity
  Can someone check the Part II of the new Minkus Pages for Togo Please
  3rd Reich / Nazi stamps
  Stamp Smarter May Contest
  Scott 106xx-7-P6 Precancel
  Gems and Minerals
  Rochester, New York ??? What am I misunderstanding here?
  Automatic Supplements

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.53 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05