Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

topical collecting and printing processes  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
22 Posts
Posted 10/27/2016   8:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add angreeley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
I apologize if I'm repeating a previous thread topic here, but I'm curious to know how everything thinks various stamp printing processes rank in quality. I know many of you here are particularly fond of engraved stamps, as am I, and I'd love to have your thoughts on stamps printed by photogravure and other processes. Are there certain types of printed stamps, for those of you topical collectors, that you avoid collecting for reasons of detail or quality?
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
519 Posts
Posted 10/28/2016   04:28 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I love photogravure in all it variations.. Recess is over-appreciated. The time of an engraver working months to prepare a stamp are long gone bye. France and Austria use computer-steered "engraving" of every sliiy design ...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
227 Posts
Posted 10/31/2016   04:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 65170 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Angreeley: Every printing process has its fan and detractor. How do you measure quality; much is subjective. Engraved stamps come top of my list (no surprise there), for the skills employed at all stages of production (yes, even when computer engraved) and are second to none.

The design should always be applicable to the process used and many designers, especially from the "computer age", do not seem to appreciate this! Some gravure stamps, for example, should never have used that process, as the design does not take advantage of the tonal qualities of gravure. Similarly, some engraved stamps printed by intaglio offer nothing by using that process (as Rein states) and could have been done by solely using offset, which would be much cheaper and have no loss in visual quality or impact. Some administrations use offset instead of using intaglio to the total detriment of the finished stamp, which often appear flat and lifeless.

Each process has specific attributes and I have made an attempt at describing some of these below.

Intaglio: A high security process (hence its continued use on banknotes). Difficult and expensive to replicate by forgers. Great for all line work, portraits and vignettes. Very tactile with its raised surface. Works especially well when printed in just one colour, or at most two (a personal view!).

Letterpress: Currently undergoing a resurgence, but not on stamps. Older letterpress stamps could invariably be best identified from the reverse side because the design often felt raised to the touch due to the use of the metal plates and heavy pressure used. These days, plastic plates are used and tend not to leave the raised reverse. Modern "Letterpress" stamps tend to actually be by flexography and are indistinguishable from offset to the eye.

Gravure: Especially good when designs utilise tonal ranges (i.e. gradations of colour). Best suited for long print runs (some printers say 10 million plus stamps), so do not expect a tiny island that posts very little mail to print by gravure, unless they have a huge print budget!

Offset: Best suited for small to medium sized print runs. The widespread use of offset saw multi-coloured stamps rapidly take-over from one or two coloured stamps. This is the most readily accessible form of commercial printing available today, with comparatively low set-up costs and suitability for runs up to around ten million stamps. Today, around nine out of ten stamps that are produced worldwide use offset. (Source of usage statistic: The UPU, Switzerland.)

Silk screen: Great for where heavy ink weights are required, e.g. the latex 'scratch-off' areas on some stamps, or large areas of solid ink colour, such as a mono-coloured background. Not good for, say, 'fine line' text.

Digital: Currently best suited for small print runs (but slowly increasing in volume as new machines develop). Every stamp on an entire print run could theoretically be different (i.e. unique). Easier to forge, as many of us own some of the production equipment in our homes, such as colour laser printers. There are not enough digital stamps "out there" yet for forgery to have taken hold, but I suggest that it will become a problem over time.

As for thematic (topical) collectors, I used to collect based purely on design and the ability of that stamp to advance the story that I was attempting to tell. I cannot imagine that any other thematic collector would buy a stamp unless it advanced their story, which implies that the stamp had the "detail and quality" that he sought. The process used would not enter into my buying decision, nor would poor quality printing if the stamp depicted the only known example of an 1852 letter box from a particular country on a stamp!

I hope this may help. GLENN
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
22 Posts
Posted 11/05/2016   12:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add angreeley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Glenn, thank you so much for your response. Your descriptions of the printing processes are very helpful. I see now why some photogravure stamps I quite like, and why others look terrible to me. Excellent info!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  "The Stamp Collecting Mania" in the NY Times
  Spain Civil war issue
  Uruguay cover to Germany 1937. Airmail route???
  Older Scott Specialty Slip Cases???
  Eid stamp issue (May 24/17)
  Scott 106xx-7-P6 Precancel
  Seeking advice/comments on collection organization and storage
  3rd Reich / Nazi stamps
  US Scott 443 Washington 1c line single?
  The Stamps of Tokelau.
  Moscow to New York: two letter-size envelopes w/ Scott Russia #C75 1 PVB
  Can someone check the Part II of the new Minkus Pages for Togo Please
  Is my Washington 2 Cent stamp an error or just an oddity
  Need help please on this 1870 2 cent jackson scott 135 Red???
  Private Auctions on eBay
  Woohoo! Went 3 for 3 at the Philatelic Foundation!
  Help re Postal Service eGuide to US Stamps
  Imperforate 4d Kangaroo?
  Cut Square Stamp identification
  Looks like eBay is broken now?
  Canada Odd Unlisted Precancels - possibly Errors
  Canada Empress of Ireland press sheet
  Help with IDing watermark on cut square
  A perfectly placed ink void
  Lovely Q3 parcel post on first flight cover

  Older Scott Specialty Slip Cases???
  The Stamps of Tokelau.
  Eid stamp issue (May 24/17)
  Jaipur and Rabat - stationery envelopes
  Spain Civil war issue
  "The Stamp Collecting Mania" in the NY Times
  Don't be deceived by this odd item
  PDF style Stamp Album Pages
  US Scott 443 Washington 1c line single?
  Uruguay cover to Germany 1937. Airmail route???
  My Incredible Ebay Score
  Regency Stamp Auctions in St. Louis
  What are some RED CROSS stamps that you have??
  Textile and weaving of cloth
  Seeking advice/comments on collection organization and storage
  Waterfalls on Stamps
  Water on stamps
  Is my Washington 2 Cent stamp an error or just an oddity
  Can someone check the Part II of the new Minkus Pages for Togo Please
  3rd Reich / Nazi stamps
  Stamp Smarter May Contest
  Scott 106xx-7-P6 Precancel
  Gems and Minerals
  Rochester, New York ??? What am I misunderstanding here?
  Automatic Supplements

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.61 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05