Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

"Near very fine" wording?  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
146 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   1:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add James Drummond to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
H. R. Harmer (https://hrharmer.com/en/home#) has an upcoming auction #3013 with some interesting lot descriptions, at least in the revenue section.

This stamp is described as "near very fine."





Maybe it's just me, but it seems like saying a stamp is almost very well centered, when it fact it clearly isn't, is a weird way of describing something.

It's like saying something is almost new: it either is new, or it isn't.

Perhaps this goes with the "couple blunted perfs" comment, when clearly one fourth of all the perforations are "blunted." So, 25% is a "couple"?

Jim
Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
405 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   1:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jarnick to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
"near very fine" clearly means fine. Almost as bad as "would be very fine but for missing corner".
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
901 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   3:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Not to mention a pretty sloppy reperforating job on the left side.

How about "nearly very fine, except for clipped right side, short perf on top, reperforated left side, and centering."
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
146 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   3:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add James Drummond to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
One last thing: the cancel is printed, not handstamped.

So... pretty much everything in the item description is incorrect.

Jim
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3558 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   5:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's probably not reperforated, just some very dull pins. It's a well known printed cancel, but they are not particularly knowledgeable about revenues. The opening bid is probably too close to the retail value for it to get any bids.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3558 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   5:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Actually the next lot appears to be worse; I doubt that it is genuine. Nor is 1673 likely to be genuine. And I have my doubts about 1683.

https://stampauctionnetwork.com/ha/ha301334.cfm#97
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
146 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   5:29 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add James Drummond to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think you meant lot 1684?

Almost a classic fake imperf.: three reasonable margins and then the fourth is no margin at all.

Jim


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3558 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   5:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The $1.60 would have to be looked at, but it actually has much to recommend itself. The impression and shade appear to be correct. And these values were printed quite close together, it would be very unusual to have both the top and bottom margins so wide on a perforated stamp. I am inclined to think it genuine, albeit a not very attractive example.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3558 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   5:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Some perforated pairs from the Curtis census. Notice how small the margins are.

http://www.thecurtiscollection.com/...stampType=66
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
228 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   6:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 1typesetter to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
And no mention of the pinholes in Lot 1698.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3558 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   7:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like staple holes and a small tear. Must be part of the premium.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
2717 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   9:04 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The $1.60 would have to be looked at, but it actually has much to recommend itself. The impression and shade appear to be correct. And these values were printed quite close together, it would be very unusual to have both the top and bottom margins so wide on a perforated stamp. I am inclined to think it genuine, albeit a not very attractive example.


I agree with Bart. As much as one can tell from Interwebz pictures, if I had to bet on one side or the other, I would lean genuine.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page


  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  California Covers - 3 Humboldt Co., 1 Mendocino
  What is your most prized philatelic possession?
  Avatar Request--thank you!
  US $2 Inverted Jenny Stamp Sheet to Remain on Sell
  Full double transfer on R14.
  Latest on the Demise of Turbo Lister
  help identify greece stamp with overprints?
  British East Africa Questions
  Availability of "The Complete Deegam Machin Handbook"
  Help needed with 10c Banknote id
  "The Stamp Collecting Mania" in the NY Times
  Spain Civil war issue
  Uruguay cover to Germany 1937. Airmail route???
  Older Scott Specialty Slip Cases???
  Eid stamp issue (May 24/17)
  Scott 106xx-7-P6 Precancel
  Seeking advice/comments on collection organization and storage
  3rd Reich / Nazi stamps
  US Scott 443 Washington 1c line single?
  The Stamps of Tokelau.
  Moscow to New York: two letter-size envelopes w/ Scott Russia #C75 1 PVB
  Can someone check the Part II of the new Minkus Pages for Togo Please
  Is my Washington 2 Cent stamp an error or just an oddity
  Need help please on this 1870 2 cent jackson scott 135 Red???
  Private Auctions on eBay

  FOOTWARE - Shoes, Sneakers, and Other Foot Coverings!
  Log in question when using FireFox
  US Scott 443 Washington 1c line single?
  German Perfin Catalog
  California Covers - 3 Humboldt Co., 1 Mendocino
  US $2 Inverted Jenny Stamp Sheet to Remain on Sell
  Regency Stamp Auctions in St. Louis
  Can someone check the Part II of the new Minkus Pages for Togo Please
  UX22 Postal Card donation/ giveaway.
  Availability of "The Complete Deegam Machin Handbook"
  Seeking advice/comments on collection organization and storage
  What are some RED CROSS stamps that you have??
  What is your most prized philatelic possession?
  Turtle Stamps
  Latest on the Demise of Turbo Lister
  The Stamps of Australia : On Steiner Pages.
  The Stamps of Portugal.
  Everything's Coming Up BUTTERFLIES!
  Full double transfer on R14.
  Avatar Request--thank you!
  Stamps On Television
  GOLD is everywhere, everything is GOLDEN
  Harding 2c #613 - perf 11
  Older Scott Specialty Slip Cases???
  "The Stamp Collecting Mania" in the NY Times

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05