Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Computer Vended Postage - First Value Forerunners in US Postal History  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
17 Posts
Posted 09/06/2015   10:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add DrDarryl to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
I wrote this up a few years ago. My hobbies rotate between stamps and coins.

Here is the case of the first value forerunners (CVP52 and CVP53) in US Postal History.

https://thecvpcollector.wordpress.c...tal-history/

Opinions or comments?
Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
17 Posts
Posted 09/06/2015   10:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DrDarryl to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
773 Posts
Posted 09/08/2015   10:18 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The article was interestng, but as an observation, "First Value Forerunners" means nothing to me as a thread title or an article title. The article is about a special type of CVP, so "CVP" should feature prominently in the title.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
977 Posts
Posted 09/08/2015   10:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add blcjr to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Obviously a very esoteric collecting focus. Not only should the title say "CVP" the term "Value Forerunner" needs to be explained for the hordes of us who have never heard the term before. And after figuring out what it means, it is even more esoteric. (From what I understand, the term refers to an instance where a private firm issued postage in a specific value before the USPS did. Apparently this has only happened twice, in connection with the same effort to develop private vending of computer postage. I can see this being of some interest to those interested in CVP. I also don't see it being much different than when regular postage stamps are found used/cancelled prior to the official day of usage. But maybe there's more to it than I realize.)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
17 Posts
Posted 09/09/2015   4:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DrDarryl to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The title is appropriate as stated. It applies to both U.S non-CVP and U.S CVP issues.

As being the first instance in U.S. Postal Service history, I would expect U.S. collectors to be unfamiliar with the term "forerunner". However, the term is known and documented by world stamp collectors. Please Google the term "forerunner stamp" and you will see non-U.S. examples (and explanations).

The onset of the USPS providing authorization to CVP vendors to print on-demand postage enabled this "fixed value forerunner" occurrence.

The term "fixed value" provides a more precise description as Neopost USA was the only CVP vendor authorized to produce $3.85 and $13.65 fixed value stamps during the APC evaluation period. The other CVP vendor(s) were producing variable value stamps under USPS authorization.

The information was presented to make collectors aware that USPS use of CVP vendors will continue to trigger a "fixed value forerunner" occurrence if certain precautions acted upon. If fact, the reference source identified at the wordpress website, had identified a 2nd "fixed value forerunner" occurrence with a different CVP vendor at another postal rate increase.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
17 Posts
Posted 03/10/2016   11:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DrDarryl to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Created this video based on one of my previous exhibit entry. Video was made quickly and I see a few leveling issues (visual and audio edits required).

Click the YouTube button to get the video to play in full-screen mode.

aF24o2oNGTM
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by DrDarryl - 03/10/2016 11:38 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
812 Posts
Posted 03/11/2016   12:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cjpalermo1964 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I disagree that the use of "forerunner" in this article and video is correct. The established meaning of the term refers to stamps that preceded the first official issues of a country or jurisdiction. For the United States, the postmasters' provisionals that preceded the official 1847 issue could be considered forerunners. However, the term is not used in mainstream philately for the situation you are describing in which authorized private printings occurred before a later official printing, yet long after the first stamp of the country appeared. You are describing authorized private provisional printings, nothing more. At best, you are overloading the term, that is, ascribing a new meaning that relates to an analogous but different situation than for the original meaning.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
17 Posts
Posted 03/11/2016   6:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DrDarryl to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Source information is leverage from Americover 2007 Gold winner (also won Gold Curtis B. Patterson Award and AAPE Novice Award). Review the pages where CVP52 and CVP53 are identified. Note that the Meter Stamp Society provides these links.

http://www.meterstampsociety.com/Ex...C%20FDCs.pdf

http://www.meterstampsociety.com/convention.html

This same individual has also published articles relating to these value forerunners in U.S. Stamp News. Locate the link: Neopost Computer Vended Postage First Day Stamps & Cover
http://www.efocc.org/Resources/Ryskamp/main.php
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by DrDarryl - 03/11/2016 6:17 pm
Valued Member
United States
17 Posts
Posted 03/11/2016   6:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DrDarryl to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The July 2006 U.S. Stamp News article is my primary reference source. See right side of page.

http://cvpcollector.tripod.com/arti.../combine.pdf

Information I used is documented and referenced from a well known stamp publication.

This author has an impressive list of article publications which is the basis of his philately credentials.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by DrDarryl - 03/11/2016 6:38 pm
Valued Member
United States
17 Posts
Posted 03/11/2016   6:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DrDarryl to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Another reference source is at (you will have to copy and paste the link...this is an archived version of the original web catalog).

http://web.archive.org/web/20091027053023/http://geocities.com/cerizet/contents.htm

Some pages are spotty and the archive did not reach down to the lower link levels.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by DrDarryl - 03/11/2016 6:44 pm
Valued Member
United States
17 Posts
Posted 03/11/2016   6:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DrDarryl to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
From this link (copy and paste)
http://web.archive.org/web/20091027122932/http://geocities.com/cerizet/introduction.htm


Quote:
1. The most important regular denominated United States stamps ever issued, the great "forerunner" stamps, varieties h4-h4a and h7-h7b and b8-b8a and b9-b9a. The Neopost $3.85 and $13.65 stamps issued before July 30, 2002, are the first stamps ever issued in the United States before the USPS issued stamps itself for the same denominations. Issued beginning June 30 through July 29, there are, from both kiosks, 33 mint $3.85 stamps and 21 on first day cover. There are 44 mint $13.65 stamps and 22 on first day cover. With the exception of a single philatelic usage, the first day covers are the only usages before July 30.


The USPS Express mail cover in the video (last item) is the item reference as

Quote:
...With the exception of a single philatelic usage, the first day covers are the only usages before July 30



Quote:
198. $2500. Variety b9a sequence of three 13.65 sets, except stamp is missing on first sheet. Forerunner. Superb.

There is a variety b9a philatelic usage usage on cover dated July 15 (cancel barely missed stamp); this is the only example of a regular denominated $13.65 stamp on cover, apart from the first day covers, before the United States issued its own $13.65 stamp on July 30--one of the greatest of the Neopost covers. The correction was made on variety b9b which, however, shows M missing. There are four $13.65 "sets."
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by DrDarryl - 03/11/2016 6:52 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1177 Posts
Posted 03/11/2016   10:45 pm  Show Profile Check eyeonwall's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add eyeonwall to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Darryl, I see you are still drinking JR's Coolaid.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
812 Posts
Posted 03/12/2016   09:33 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cjpalermo1964 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I stand by my comment. All the citations are recent and overload the term, departing from its accepted international meaning. They appear to be attempts to increase the importance and value of a mundane item by adding a fancy label. In my opinion.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
2859 Posts
Posted 03/13/2016   09:22 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ikeyPikey to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Not to start any food fights, but are we permitted to use the terms "ATM postage" and "CVP postage" interchangeably, or are we expected to know better?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
17 Posts
Posted 12/25/2016   5:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DrDarryl to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Darryl, I see you are still drinking JR's Coolaid.


It's been sometime since I visited this website...

Apparently, you meant to say Kool-AidŽ.

Actually, I've been drinking Champagne thanks to JR.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  Stamps of the Etappengebiet West
  1962 Great Britain Stampex Sheet
  Where can I find information on the value of this stamp
  Could these really be 634b??
  Sulfurized, oxidized 3c 1851-57 stamps. Is there a safe method to refresh the color?
  Chinese stamp I/D needed
  GB King Gv clarifications needed
  Possible 177 Special Printing?
  Share of a Nice double Var Small Queen 44a/ii
  "British Occupation of Iraq" Stamps - Where do they belong?
  Found sealed 2003 Old Glory Booklet bundle in late father's storage. I know nothing about stamps
  Hungarian Post Office Branch numbers
  Need details over Uruguay Air Tax from 1953 to 1959
  Farwell 409b coils never heard them, any ideas?
  Need informations over Air Tax from Colombia 1955 to 1959
  Brazil rates 1946-1950 : need details !
  Scott numbers for issue 19th december 2016 Argentina ?
  Travancore Anchel on SS overprint
  Stamp Fallen off at Toronto handstamp
  Ebay Stamp Sales Totals Last 90 Days
  British stamp mistery
  1897 Canada High Value Jubilees Opinions and Values please?
  Another stamp that needs to be identified...
  Grill help needed 15 cent Lincoln
  Need help on saving stamps

  Sulfurized, oxidized 3c 1851-57 stamps. Is there a safe method to refresh the color?
  Germany WWII POW covers
  Stamps of the Etappengebiet West
  1962 Great Britain Stampex Sheet
  The Stamps of Turkey : On Steiner Pages.
  Where can I find information on the value of this stamp
  Need help with Chinese/oriental stamps identification
  1897 Canada High Value Jubilees Opinions and Values please?
  US Scotts 312 - offered on ebay - not
  GB King Gv clarifications needed
  Show us your U.S. revenue SOTN/bullseye cancels!
  Found sealed 2003 Old Glory Booklet bundle in late father's storage. I know nothing about stamps
  Share of a Nice double Var Small Queen 44a/ii
  Chinese stamp I/D needed
  Could these really be 634b??
  Ebay Stamp Sales Totals Last 90 Days
  "British Occupation of Iraq" Stamps - Where do they belong?
  Mail from Hungary- Four weeks and waiting
  Free Magnifier from KoalaStamps with every member review
  British stamp mistery
  Any interest in world Postal Stationery?
  Possible 177 Special Printing?
  Farwell 409b coils never heard them, any ideas?
  A peroxide transformation
  Another stamp that needs to be identified...

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.62 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05