Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

best watermark detection?  
 

Previous Page | Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
887 Posts
Posted 08/07/2015   5:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jkelley01938 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
By the way, thanks to all of you for sharing this technique. It is awesome!

Jack Kelley
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
908 Posts
Posted 08/07/2015   5:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Historical DNA Collector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Jack,
Glad to hear it's helping! Is wet scanning with Clarity any better or worse than with Ronsonol? Maybe you could post scans of the same stamp, each with a different fluid, but don't tell us which is which? That would allow all of us to make our own opinion.

---------------------

Dave,
I agree that we should see at least some darker uninked areas. However, I don't know all of the characteristics of watermarks nor expertisation detection methods.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page


Ryan = HDNAC = DNA = HDC = Hysterical DNA Collector = Historical DNA Collector = me who just loves stamps :)
Edited by Historical DNA Collector - 08/07/2015 6:01 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
887 Posts
Posted 08/07/2015   6:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jkelley01938 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
DNA,

Will do. Sometime this weekend. I will say, at this point, that the Ronsonal stays "wet" for a longer time.

Jack Kelley
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
908 Posts
Posted 08/07/2015   6:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Historical DNA Collector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Cool, I look forward to it. Could be a good topic to start a "Poll" about.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page


Ryan = HDNAC = DNA = HDC = Hysterical DNA Collector = Historical DNA Collector = me who just loves stamps :)
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts
Posted 08/07/2015   6:38 pm  Show Profile Check docgfd's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add docgfd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I use fluids myself, but have a left-over 'toy' from my youth that I bought in London back in the late 1960's or so that works remarkably well. Its called the Philatector which uses an integral wheel of coloured filters (as well as some additional ones that can be slid in) with a battery powered light source. No fuss, no mess, but sometimes I have to kill the room lights to see some of the more difficult ones. These can occasionally be found on eBay and are nowhere near as expensive as the Scope.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
178 Posts
Posted 08/07/2015   6:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tlmcca to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts
Posted 08/07/2015   7:57 pm  Show Profile Check docgfd's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add docgfd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The one on eBay has been retrofitted to fit current battery types, which I had to do myself. It used to take a 5.4 volt battery that was flat and around 3 x 2 inches in size with rounded edges, and both terminals on the top (as flat metal blades). I refitted mine to take a single 9-volt battery which was a piece of cake to do.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
203 Posts
Posted 08/12/2015   6:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add lukusw to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Tried the wet scan technique for the first time (using Clarity...haven't picked up any Ronsonol, yet). It definitely works. And Clarity did not evaporate too fast for the scan. Do to the concerns mentioned about liquid damaging the scanner, I did do it in the middle of the scanner glass (farthest from any cracks).

(Upside down "U" in the lower right)

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
586 Posts
Posted 08/12/2015   9:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add shermae to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Very excellent and informative posts in this thread. Sounds like Ronsonol does a better job than Clarity and I am not concerned about flammability or toxicity. Common sense when using Ronsonol must prevail.

As far as the T1, I have only used it on MNH Commonwealth and have successfully ID'd watermarks not visible with Ronsonol. The spacers create a substantial advantage for thick-paper Commonwealth. As far as potential damage, I gradually increase the pressure over a few seconds time until I see the watermark and then back off, never to put that stamp back into the device again. I do agree that all Signoscopes are too small for multiples so another method must be used.

I cannot speak to the T1's value for US as most of you have forgotten more about US philately then I will ever know.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
887 Posts
Posted 08/13/2015   06:55 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jkelley01938 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Shermae,

Not so. There are instances where Clarity is superior. Particularly on orange and yellow stamps. See the other thread (Clarity VS Ronsonal).

Jack Kelley
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
203 Posts
Posted 08/21/2015   03:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add lukusw to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I got Ronsonol for the first time last week and have tested it a little. It seems to make most watermarks "pop" out better than Clarity. However, I was still having a lot of difficulty with W/Ms on yellow or orange paper, so I'm did a little test on the same stamp. I think the Clarity worked better. There seems to be part of a single line mark under the 4th top perf from right that doesn't correlate to ink on the other side. It's easier to see with Clarity (first image). So for orange/yellow, Clarity works better. For everything else, Ronsonol seems to work better. Anyone else had this experience?


Clarity


Ronsonol

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
571 Posts
Posted 08/21/2015   07:08 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add blazenstar to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ronsonol is easy, fast drying and effective to check watermarks...smiles..
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
887 Posts
Posted 08/21/2015   09:30 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jkelley01938 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
lukusw and Family,

First off, I do believe that Clarity performs more effectively than Ronsonal on orange/yellow stamps. Some say also olive green. What has not been discussed on this thread is the usage of filters. For example, using Windows Photo Gallery (and others) after wet scanning the stamp. Doing so provides different effects. You can tint the stamp blue, grey. green, etc Each time you'll get a different effect and the watermark can be more easily seen.

I am not sure what we see here in the top scan. There is something there. And the Clarity is clearly better. At first I thought it was part of an "S". But now I think I'm seeing the bottom half of a "U". I'm probably wrong because every time (almost), I always see a "U"! Comment are most welcome here.

Jack Kelley
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
908 Posts
Posted 08/21/2015   4:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Historical DNA Collector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
lukusw,
Your two wet scans don't have enough detail. It looks like the image optimizer didn't work well. Their "Levels" are out of whack. Scanning at a lower resolution like 600 dpi would help. Also, I can help you compress them below the image maximum size limit. Reply to the email I sent you if you like.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page


Ryan = HDNAC = DNA = HDC = Hysterical DNA Collector = Historical DNA Collector = me who just loves stamps :)
Valued Member
United States
351 Posts
Posted 08/21/2015   11:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stampalotapus to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Possibly use of RetroReveal.org could help.

I haven't personally utilized it, but am curious whether such could help with this elusive watermark.

Regards,
Stampalotapus
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  Unknown #483 Plate Number ?
  Mexico Official stamp?
  Lots of old fakes and forgeries out there.
  Free British Stamp Exhibitions Catalogue
  British Stamp Exhibitions Catalogue
  china 1941-1945 airpost
  3 Latvia 1909 Postcards--Same Model, Same Props, Different Poses
  Panama first day cover scott 258 from Czerna C. Lafler collection
  Washington 2 Cent What stamp should I look for ؟
  Help! Russian Wrapper, what sender destination?
  How many proofs are in circulation..?
  Need help with Romania charity stamp.
  Amelia Earhart Overprint Mexican stamp
  Is This Newspaper Stamp PR22, 69, or 88
  Stamp Insider for March–April 2017
  strange half Danish stamp on German postcard
  Some oddities from my album
  Belgium and Luxembourg Stamp Catalogs
  That Wonderful Global Shipping Program
  1893 US 2c Columbian stamp, possible Error of Color or aged?
  Apfelbaum's Corner Is Back
  Identify bluish paper "on the fly"
  What Am I Doing Wrong with the Image Optimizer?
  Yugoslavia SC#238 missing vs mis-aligned
  Stamps without a country? Assistance please.

  Cover Calendar for month and day -PICS
  Lots of old fakes and forgeries out there.
  Mexico Official stamp?
  Unknown #483 Plate Number ?
  1962 Great Britain Stampex Sheet
  Oregon state revenue
  5c Columbian Double Transfer?
  British Stamp Exhibitions Catalogue
  Some oddities from my album
  Bugs, Insects, & Creepy Crawlies
  strange half Danish stamp on German postcard
  BRIDGES,BRIDGES,BRIDGES! on stamps
  Mathematics on stamps
  advice on selling collection of 2300 Austria
  How can I tell if a stamp on cover has a watermark?
  Help! Russian Wrapper, what sender destination?
  What Was in YOUR Mailbox Today??
  Antique Stamp Albums
  Introducing others to our hobby
  Free British Stamp Exhibitions Catalogue
  Great Britain-1912 Wmk Imperial Crown SG343 and Sc#154a/1d. Aniline Scarlet?
  Chickens!
  C-Grill? Z-Grill? F-Grill? And Possible Pigeon Blood?
  1893 US 2c Columbian stamp, possible Error of Color or aged?
  china 1941-1945 airpost

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 1.72 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05